The final might feature Argentina against Spain, but devoted media observers in the UK know that when it comes to broadcasting, a World Cup is always a domestic contest between the public broadcaster and the commercial network. So who came out on top based on these key measures?
The studios
Ahead of the tournament, much was made of the public broadcaster’s choice not to travel to the US, instead relying on a digital studio in Salford to create the illusion that its panel was sitting in front of host city landmarks. It was an unmistakable admission of tighter budgets. The commercial network, meanwhile, operated out of New York for the entire event, meaning its analysts were still a long way from the action in Mexico, Canada, or the US West Coast, yet they appeared more comfortably settled in an American setting. In a twist of fate, just as the public broadcaster finally made the trip to the US, the England team was heading home. Winner: The commercial network
The pundits
The commercial network assembled an impressive group, led by two standout figures: the famously irritable Roy Keane and, at least while Australia remained in the competition, the ever-quotable Ange Postecoglou. Jobi McAnuff delivered sharp analysis and was unfortunate to be largely relegated to late-night fixtures, while the lively Ian Wright never fails to entertain. The channel also recovered from an early misstep that seemed to place the highly respected Emma Hayes in what was swiftly labeled the “tactical kitchen.”
The public broadcaster is clearly still figuring out its post-Lineker lineup, where he once served as both host and a pundit who had experienced a World Cup firsthand. Micah Richards’s energy divides opinion, but from this network’s roster, former England goalkeeper Joe Hart was the one who truly impressed, with Alan Shearer and Wayne Rooney often appearing as lackluster as an English defense caught off guard by an Argentine forward line. Winner: The commercial network
A perennial mystery for viewers at home is how commentators and ex-players can be paid to describe some of the world’s biggest games, yet still manage to sound disinterested or slightly put out by the occasion—call it the Mark Lawrenson effect. Jonathan Pearce on the public broadcaster and Lee Dixon on the commercial network were the usual culprits in this regard, while Ally McCoist’s boundless enthusiasm was the complete opposite. Ultimately, the public broadcaster boasts the stronger lineup, with Guy Mowbray far more pleasant to listen to than Sam Matterface. Winner: The public broadcaster
What about post-match interviews?
Post-match interviews generated headlines for both channels, but for starkly different reasons. Harry Kane losing his voice after England’s victory over Mexico at the Azteca was one of the most unintentionally hilarious sporting interviews ever aired by the public broadcaster – and endlessly remixable. Gabriel Clarke’s approach after England’s quarter-final with Norway on the commercial network did not go down as well. His decision to relay Thomas Tuchel’s criticism of the performance directly to Jude Bellingham appeared to reopen old wounds between the manager and his star player. Winner: The public broadcaster
The refereeing analysis
Christina Unkel’s input on the commercial network was a clear level above what Darren Cann offered on the public broadcaster. She was direct and no-nonsense, whereas he hedged his views with so many qualifications that they became, regrettably, almost meaningless. Winner: The commercial network
The music and titles
Neither offering came close to the iconic Nessun Dorma of 1990 or the commercial network’s surprisingly catchy 1986 Mexico track, but Rascal Flatts’ “Life is a Highway” started to wear thin early in the tournament, making the public broadcaster’s animated title sequence—with its recreated memorable moments and figures from World Cup history—look and sound far superior. Winner: The public broadcaster
And the most unexpected viral moment
Danny Murphy’s baffling choice to start talking about his late cat named Bob, who ran away in a Royal Mail van, simply because Norway had brought on a player called Oscar Bobb, will follow him for the rest of his career. “The game’s not that bad,” deadpanned the public broadcaster’s Steve Bower in response. Winner: In a way, all of us. Except Bob
What do you feel about this post?
Like
Love
Happy
Haha
Sad
