Traditional printed season tickets have disappeared from the top flight of English football.
Teams now rely on mobile-based entry, where supporters download passes straight to their devices. Alongside this shift, many sides have tightened the rules governing how frequently, and by what means, season ticket holders can pass on their seats.
At Old Trafford, for instance, a season ticket can be taken away if the holder fails to attend or transfer their seat to an approved contact for a minimum of 16 of the 19 home league matches.
During the previous campaign, the team relocated 500 long-standing season ticket holders to make space for a rise in premium hospitality packages.
Since the partial acquisition by Ineos in 2024, the Manchester side have made significant staffing reductions, including within the ticketing department.
The technique used to flag dubious accounts relies on external software and is mainly handled automatically.
In a note shared with the supporters’ forum last week, after the initial restrictions were issued, the club stood by its approach and maintained that the overwhelming majority of those facing penalties had broken the rules.
“Our recent operation targeted cases where multiple accounts showed signs of being run from a single source, coordinated by the same person, or managed through automated bots,” they explained.
“We have a high degree of certainty that most of the accounts flagged for improper use were correctly identified and dealt with.”
Last season, United launched a clampdown on illegal reselling, voiding 22,000 tickets across the opening five home fixtures.
They consider that tally merely the visible portion of a much larger problem, estimating that touts control between 10 and 15 percent of season tickets.
A collective message backed by various United fan groups, supporter clubs and fanzines recognised the need to combat touting but stressed that the matter must be handled fairly.
“The club and its followers share a common aim: to see tickets used legitimately by real Manchester United fans while safeguarding the system’s integrity,” the statement read.
“That aim can be reached only through mutual trust, openness, well-designed processes, proportionate measures and genuine dialogue.
“Pausing to review the current methods, involving supporter representatives and rebuilding confidence serves both the club and its fans.”
What do you feel about this post?
Like
Love
Happy
Haha
Sad
