Tonda Eckert’s position as Southampton manager remains uncertain while he awaits the outcome of a thorough Football Association inquiry into the spying controversy that overshadowed last season.
In May, the English Football League barred Southampton from the Championship playoff final against Hull after concluding that a club intern acting as a first-team analyst had secretly observed a pivotal Middlesbrough training session before the semi-final first leg at the Riverside.
Southampton and Eckert also acknowledged to the EFL disciplinary panel that the head coach had “specifically authorised” comparable covert operations against two other sides during the campaign. The additional breaches of EFL rules occurred before league fixtures with Oxford and Ipswich.
William Salt, the 23-year-old intern sent to spy on Middlesbrough, has reportedly been offered a permanent analyst role within Southampton’s academy, though both he and Eckert could still face severe sanctions, potentially including year-long bans from all football activity if a precedent set by Fifa is applied.
That was the penalty imposed on Canada women’s head coach Bev Priestman by Fifa in 2024 after she was found to have been involved in using a drone to spy on New Zealand at the Paris Olympics. Two members of Priestman’s staff also received one-year football bans.
Eckert’s future hangs in the balance, but it is believed he underwent extensive questioning by the FA earlier this month. The 33-year-old German – a former analyst for the Germany senior men’s side – has stayed largely out of public view this summer while conducting pre-season training for a Southampton team that will begin the new campaign burdened by a four-point deduction imposed by the EFL as part of the spying punishment.
On Saturday evening, Eckert’s men will play their first pre-season friendly away to non-league neighbours Eastleigh, where the manager is expected to face journalists for the first time this summer.
It had appeared Southampton were poised to dismiss Eckert in late May, but instead the club opted to stand firmly by their clearly talented young coach. Earlier this summer, Southampton owner Dragan Solak stated that Eckert had made a mistake, apologised and warranted a second chance. Yet whether they will have Eckert in the away dugout when their Championship season kicks off at Watford on Sunday, 16 August, now rests with the FA.
Although the EFL lacked the authority to sanction individuals, the written justification from their independent disciplinary commission for expelling Southampton from the playoff final and deducting four points for the new season delivered a blistering rebuke of both the club and Eckert.
They declared that Southampton had devised a “contrived and determined plan from the top down” to gain unlawful information for competitive gain. The panel also took an exceedingly dim view of the club’s use of a reluctant Salt, branding the pressure placed on him by senior figures as “particularly deplorable”.
Sign up to Football Daily
Kick off your evenings with the Guardian’s take on the world of football
Significantly, the EFL commission cited what it called the “Canada case” that led to Priestman’s suspension as a precedent during its decision-making.
Southampton have not responded to requests for comment from this newspaper.
What do you feel about this post?
Like
Love
Happy
Haha
Sad
